View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0004633 | Dwarf Fortress | Creatures | public | 2011-05-12 08:24 | 2011-05-12 18:47 |
| Reporter | habskovy27 | Assigned To | Logical2u | ||
| Priority | low | Severity | tweak | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | resolved | Resolution | no change required | ||
| Platform | PC | OS | Windows | OS Version | 7 |
| Product Version | 0.31.25 | ||||
| Summary | 0004633: Giant in cage trap | ||||
| Description | I got a giant trapped in a cage... As far as I can tell, a giant wouldn't fit in a dwarven cage! | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | Build cage traps and wait for the giant to come! | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
|
This isn't a bug, just a design deficiency - cage traps can capture any large creature regardless of its body size. |
|
|
Yeah I know this is not a bug, that's why I marked it as a tweak. In my opinion a giant should be immune to cage traps. I know cages can capture large creature, but grizzly bears are large creatures, giant are huge ones! |
|
|
This bug tracker is not supposed to be used for feature suggestions; also, there are multiple threads in the Suggestions forum regarding the overpoweredness of cage traps. |
|
|
It's just that after seeign things like this 0003586, I thought any tweaking suggestion would be taken into account. And if this is a bug tracker, why is there a "tweak" severity level? Anyways, sorry if I was wrong to post it here! |
|
|
"It's just that after seeign things like this 0003586, I thought any tweaking suggestion would be taken into account. And if this is a bug tracker, why is there a "tweak" severity level? Anyways, sorry if I was wrong to post it here!" 0003586 was a text bug in the naming system for dark fortresses, while this, I'd argue, is a feature-change/new-feature report. A little different. Although we haven't written a complete help document for the tracker yet, here's what I think. There's a tweak severity level for things that are probably bugs but can be user-modified through 'tweak'ing, or would only be a tweak to fix. Usually people use the "minor" or "trivial" severity for those reports though. EG: Almost anything involving RAW editing that isn't text/caste errors I would classify as a tweak, if it's not entirely gamebreaking. There's really nothing to be sorry about though! I'm actually pleased that you responded to comments on your report in a timely manner and all! |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-05-12 08:24 | habskovy27 | New Issue | |
| 2011-05-12 08:42 | Quietust | Note Added: 0017695 | |
| 2011-05-12 09:15 | habskovy27 | Note Added: 0017698 | |
| 2011-05-12 11:22 | Quietust | Note Added: 0017699 | |
| 2011-05-12 11:51 | habskovy27 | Note Added: 0017700 | |
| 2011-05-12 18:47 | Logical2u | Note Added: 0017705 | |
| 2011-05-12 18:47 | Logical2u | Status | new => resolved |
| 2011-05-12 18:47 | Logical2u | Resolution | open => no change required |
| 2011-05-12 18:47 | Logical2u | Assigned To | => Logical2u |
