View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0009645 | Dwarf Fortress | Language | public | 2016-03-20 19:11 | 2016-03-29 15:01 |
| Reporter | Brightgalrs | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | low | Severity | trivial | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | new | Resolution | open | ||
| Product Version | 0.42.06 | ||||
| Summary | 0009645: There are no adjective forms for various colors in language_words.txt | ||||
| Description | This applies to "lime", "orange", "lilac", "moss", "periwinkle", and "plum", and possibly others. I'll use orange as an example. [WORD:ORANGE] [NOUN:orange:oranges] [FRONT_COMPOUND_NOUN_SING] [REAR_COMPOUND_NOUN_SING] [THE_NOUN_SING] [REAR_COMPOUND_NOUN_PLUR] [OF_NOUN_PLUR] It only has a noun form. Either it should have an ADJ entry or there should be a separate [WORD:ORANGE_COLOR]. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
|
These words are all plants, not colors. Expanding the vocabulary to include new words or senses of words is a suggestion, not a bug, even if the words are polysemes. |
|
|
@Button You are correct. That is why I said they only have noun entries. Other colors have both noun and adjective entries (like emerald, ivory, and charcoal). This is pointing out a possible oversight, not a suggestion. I hope I have clarified this issue. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-03-20 19:11 | Brightgalrs | New Issue | |
| 2016-03-21 14:50 | Button | Note Added: 0034892 | |
| 2016-03-21 14:51 | Button | Note Edited: 0034892 | |
| 2016-03-21 14:54 | Button | Note Edited: 0034892 | |
| 2016-03-21 14:56 | Button | Note Edited: 0034892 | |
| 2016-03-21 14:59 | Button | Note Edited: 0034892 | |
| 2016-03-29 15:01 | Brightgalrs | Note Added: 0034936 |
