0002584: Goblin-owned sites contain only dwarves

ID	Project	Category	View Status	Date Submitted	Last Update

0002584	Dwarf Fortress	World Generation -- General	public	2010-07-07 10:22	2010-07-07 11:18

Reporter	Mason11987	Assigned To	~~user6~~
Priority	low	Severity	minor	Reproducibility	have not tried
Status	resolved	Resolution	no change required
Product Version	0.31.08

Summary	0002584: Goblin-owned sites contain only dwarves
Description	I have this in my worldsites (there are several similar): Omospetosp, "Vilesiege", a dark fortress Owner: The Ruthlessness of Duty, goblins Parent Civ: The Lonely Cruelties, goblins 59 dwarves 1 mongoose fiend Is this intentional? I checked historical records and it APPEARS that the first Dwarf here was "Nil Atheldeduk". Nil was abducted at year 7 and brought to this site. While there she had two children. Presumably those two children grew up in this site as well. Eventually all the goblins died or were killed and only dwarves remain. There are only three sites in this civ, and they all have only dwarves living there. Should the civ and owner really be listed as "Goblin" still? If this is a "feature" that's fine, I'm just curious if it's intended or not.
Steps To Reproduce	This was a large world, 1025 years, but I bet it could happen on a smaller worldgen, I used default settings.
Tags	No tags attached.

Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2010-07-07 10:22	Mason11987	New Issue
2010-07-07 11:18	~~user6~~	Note Added: 0009733
2010-07-07 11:18	~~user6~~	Status	new => resolved
2010-07-07 11:18	~~user6~~	Resolution	open => no change required
2010-07-07 11:18	~~user6~~	Assigned To	=> user6

~~user6~~ 2010-07-07 11:18 ~0009733	Yeah, it's a "feature." Each civ is permanently associated with a race during world generation, and there's no mechanism yet for changing that association in response to demographic shifts. Besides, if it just said "dwarves" instead of "goblins," you'd have no way of telling that they were goblinized dwarves -- it is, in some sense, still a goblin civ.