View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0005493 | Dwarf Fortress | Adventure Mode -- Sites | public | 2012-02-28 03:52 | 2012-02-28 15:46 |
| Reporter | Khym Chanur | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
| Status | new | Resolution | open | ||
| Product Version | 0.34.02 | ||||
| Summary | 0005493: Keep with civilians living in it | ||||
| Description | I found an isolated keep (i.e., one that isn't in a town/city) where the central building had a child, a couple of peasants, and a gemsetter (in addition to the soldiers and leader you'd expect to find). Might be intentional. Save file available if needed. | ||||
| Tags | Intentional/Expected? | ||||
| related to | 0005618 | new | Civilians instead of military on top of city battlements |
|
|
Can you check to see if they were spouses/children of the guards? |
|
|
Looking up the jeweler in legends mode, it says "In 184, Casot settled in Jugglerbound", where Jugglerbound is the keep in question. And one of the peasants is her husband. So the question is, should a non-soldier like a jeweler ever decide to settle in an isolated keep? |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-02-28 03:52 | Khym Chanur | New Issue | |
| 2012-02-28 03:52 | Khym Chanur | Tag Attached: Intentional/Expected? | |
| 2012-02-28 06:13 | Granite26 | Note Added: 0020832 | |
| 2012-02-28 15:46 | Khym Chanur | Note Added: 0020871 | |
| 2012-03-11 07:07 | Logical2u | Relationship added | related to 0005618 |
