View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0006506 | Dwarf Fortress | General | public | 2014-06-14 07:23 | 2014-06-15 00:59 |
| Reporter | Anrock | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | crash | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | resolved | Resolution | duplicate | ||
| Platform | Linux | OS | Gentoo | ||
| Product Version | 0.34.11 | ||||
| Summary | 0006506: Tileset not found: data/art/curses_640_300.png | ||||
| Description | DF produces Tileset not found: data/art/curses_640_300.png error on launch. Also, line in console log "libpng error: bad parameters to zlib" | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | 1. Download 0.34.11 sdl from official site 2. Unpack 3. Launch df script from main folder. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
|
The default tileset is "curses_640x300.png" - can you make sure your init.txt refers to that, not "curses_640_300.png"? This sounds a lot like 0002688. Try adding "export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libz.so.1" to the "df" script before the last line. |
|
|
I mistyped. init refers to curses_640x300.png indeed. I didn't alter any settings, just unpacked & launched df script After adding LD_PRELOAD "ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libz.so.1' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded (cannot open shared object file): ignored." + same error about tileset. On my machine there is no /usr/lib/libz.so.1. There is libz.so. After changing LD_PRELOAD to /usr/lib/libz.so i got: "ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libz.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded (invalid ELF header): ignored." Also libz.so is actualy a script containing: "OUTPUT_FORMAT ( elf64-x86-64 ) GROUP ( /lib64/libz.so.1 )" Tried with LD_PRELOAD=/lib64/libz.so.1: "ERROR: ld.so: object '/lib64/libz.so.1' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded (wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64): ignored." Isn't that because arch mismatch? |
|
|
Yeah, DF is 32-bit and requires a 32-bit zlib. |
|
|
And, i guess, no 64bit version planned? |
|
|
Nevermind, found x32 zlib in /lib32, works fine. |
|
|
It sounds like this is the same problem as 0002688, then, correct? |
|
|
Please reopen if not a duplicate. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-06-14 07:23 | Anrock | New Issue | |
| 2014-06-14 07:46 | lethosor | Note Added: 0024813 | |
| 2014-06-14 08:08 | Anrock | Note Added: 0024814 | |
| 2014-06-14 08:49 | lethosor | Note Added: 0024815 | |
| 2014-06-14 09:05 | Anrock | Note Added: 0024816 | |
| 2014-06-14 09:47 | Anrock | Note Added: 0024817 | |
| 2014-06-14 10:54 | lethosor | Note Added: 0024819 | |
| 2014-06-15 00:59 |
|
Note Added: 0024823 | |
| 2014-06-15 00:59 |
|
Relationship added | duplicate of 0002688 |
| 2014-06-15 00:59 |
|
Status | new => resolved |
| 2014-06-15 00:59 |
|
Resolution | open => duplicate |
| 2014-06-15 00:59 |
|
Assigned To | => user6 |
| 2014-07-08 17:14 |
|
Relationship added | related to 0006739 |
