View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0010260 | Dwarf Fortress | Dwarf Mode -- Jobs, Hunting | public | 2017-06-27 19:50 | 2017-06-28 10:38 |
| Reporter | Loci | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | new | Resolution | open | ||
| Product Version | 0.43.03 | ||||
| Summary | 0010260: Teeth recovered from butchering does not scale properly with creature size | ||||
| Description | Butchering a creature with teeth of a certain size or larger will result in a "tooth stack" of craftable materials. However, the number of items in the stack seems to reflect the number of unique "tooth definition entries" in that creature's body definition. So a dragon, one of the largest creatures in the game, produces 3 teeth: 1 for its "TOOTH" (representing 28 actual teeth), 1 for its "R_EYE_TOOTH", and 1 for its "L_EYE_TOOTH". Modifying the raws to separate the generic "TOOTH" entry into 28 individual entries, each with RELSIZE 1, results in a stack of 30 dragon teeth instead. For a real-life example, a butchered sperm whale produces one tooth in-game (thanks to its use of the GENERIC_TEETH definition), while wikipedia notes that sperm whales have 30 teeth capable of use in scrimshaw. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | butcher a large creature | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
|
A decapitated elephant head tested in arena mode at the relevant version number 43.03 will when butchered return... 5 brains in a stack 2 ivory in a stack - relevant for each BP component 1 tooth 1 head skin but will accurately return a stack of 2 eyes ________________________________________________ Trying not to take your words out of context, changing the relevant size of a badger tooth to a overblown and exaggerated 1000 size difference procured 1 large usable tooth instead of the multiple small unusable teeth in issue report 0010255 http://www.bay12games.com/dwarves/mantisbt/view.php?id=10255#c36637 Inversely, is there a correlation in that creatures too small have a reverse formula where a negative or smaller/abnormal than intended stack size is presented? |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-06-27 19:50 | Loci | New Issue | |
| 2017-06-28 10:38 | FantasticDorf | Note Added: 0036641 |
